Article summary: “A possible planet candidate in an external galaxy detected through X-ray transit”

R. Di Stefano, Julia Berndtsson, Ryan Urquhart, Roberto Soria, Vinay L. Kashyap, Theron W. Carmichael, Nia Imara.

  1. Introduction
    One way to get a study of outer planets is obviously impossible through studies that we use in our own galaxy. That's why the brightest scientists decided to use X-ray sources ("XRS") in order to have better quality when they are made. However, outer galaxies occupy an infinitesimal part of the entire universe, and stars an even smaller part. For this reason, the study of the Universe with methods such as the measurement of radial velocity or the detection of transit means that hundreds of data that did not correspond to a planet outside our galaxy have been discarded.
    This is why everyone is surprised when in the galaxy M51, in a binary system, a very large source of X-rays is found and study begins.

  2. M51-ULS-1, X-ray
    We find that in this galaxy, there is a very large X-ray source (XRS). This binary system is provided with the star "M51-ULS-1". This star is almost in the centre of the galaxy along with other XRS "M101 and M104".
    The telescopes that were collecting data from this star (which were the Chandra and the XMM-Newton) observed that there was a drop in the brightness of this star during 10-12 ks, which provided create the study from the above methods.

    This representation can be observed from the collected data transformed into graphs.
    Il·lustració 1
    The collection of X-ray lines during the eclipse
    Il·lustració 2
    Chandra's observation of the star cluster

    From the Hubble Telescope, it could be observed that it was a type B2 star. At the same time, he was a star aged 6-14 years and giving very accurate data that the formation of this system is YES binary. Getting valid and secure information compared to “Pre-print-> M51-ULS-1b: The first Candidate for a Planet in an External Galaxy”

    We observe that we can compare X-ray curves with others in order to be able to make sure that we are not mistaken assuming the belief that it is a planet without comparison.
    This is thanks to the telescopes that provide us with information not only about the photons they receive but also about their type (Hard = H; Soft = S). We know that the energy change in the transition movements, in this case in the eclipse, must be minimal.
    As we can see in the graph of Figure 3, although there is a very large change in brightness, we do not find a large drop in intensity we find that the relationship between the number of soft (S) and hard (H) photons), quantified by the so-called hardness ratio (log 10 (S / H)) during transit is consistent with its out-of-transit value. Compared to that of the star M51-ULS-1, which although it does not undergo a major change in brightness, we do find the relationship affected.

    Il·lustració 3
    Relationship with M51-ULS-1b
    Il·lustració 4
    Relationship with the star M51-ULS-1

  3. The comparison of transit with donation-accretion of the system
    To know that M51-ULS-1b, is a planet in the galaxy M51 and is not the X-ray curve of the binary itself, so we have to deduce the main parameters of the curves. Once these parameters have been made, we can draw two conclusions about why it is a planet and not an X-ray curve of something else.
    As a first observation we have that the distribution between the radii of transit are comparable to those of Saturn.
    On the other hand, we have that the relative speed of transit between the transit and the source of X-rays is of 17 m * s ^ -1, which from some realized studies, arrives at the conclusion that it cannot be an internal X-ray since the transiting object (M51-ULS-1b) has a much larger orbit within the radius of the binary system.

  4. The comparison of transit with donation-accretion of the system
    We may wonder why we look for so much information in galaxies so far away, because although we have very powerful telescopes like Chandra and XMM, it is not the main reason. Those galaxies located in distant areas are a good place to search for new information, as X-ray telescopes can take on a much wider field of view. In this way, collecting thousands and thousands of XRS (very powerful X-ray sources). As in the case of the galaxy M51.

  5. The discovery’s form
    This article, in relation to your Prepress, aims to detail the smallest detail so that you can try to recreate this discovery so that you can clearly see the discovery that has taken place. In this way, this planet could be found from what we said before: the great source of XRS that was in the system. But within this pile of sophisticated formulas there is always a refutation of this theory given the infinite number of space bodies in the universe.
    The main theory was the belief of a white dwarf (WD), but it was refuted as its age does not correspond, however, we do not rely only on the age it may or may not have. But also by the gravitational laws that exist.
    Explain that white dwarfs when placed in the range of orbits produce an increase in light perceived by XRS, in reference to what has happened, on the contrary, is how the light has decreased.
    We can also eliminate the belief that it is a brown dwarf because through studies we can see in different graphs that the radii with which it can be compared are not the same resemblance as that of the M51-ULS-1b.

    Il·lustració 3
    Comparison of radii

  6. Future observations
    Although for now, the technology we are studying this planet of a galaxy (which is not ours) is being at very high levels of sophistication, there is always the likelihood that technologies and power will improve. reach unthinkable levels. Bearing in mind that apart from the X-ray source in the galaxy M51, it is only a small source of the hundreds found previously but not studied we can perceive that applying the same knowledge we can first find very similar planets.
    Still all this, new missions are known like the one of Lynx or ATHENA, that will provide a very great increase in XRSs.

  7. Conclusion
    Concluding with the information gathered by the two articles by Di Stefano et al., I can understand that the importance of X-rays, not only serve for medical terms, but also to be able to perceive the Universe in a different and more accurate way. Keeping in mind that it is not only important to read a finished article but also the one before it as you can always get data and information from the discoveries made in these articles which can be removed or not as defined as in this case.